For 675, the micro apartments are a good deal. Not one I would make, but understandable. The buildings that drive me crazy are the new construction microapartments in the U District and Cap Hill where they're pricing a shiny version of that same apartment for $1100/month, or the even shinier buildings in Ballard where the studios (w/full kitchen) go for like $1650/month even though older 2-bedroom apartments down the street are actually cheaper.
"City" is a stretch, but: http://mendocino.craigslist.org/apa/4675012836.html
NFW do people who never drink coffee feel like they're on a caffeine high all day long. A Slate reblog of a linkedIn post interpreting uncited medical research is trustworthy only in that you know it will be annoyingly contrarian and vaguely self-aggrandizing.
$4 for a 4-ounce pour! I mean: oyster mushrooms, but still.
In a previous incarnation as a productive member of the economy I had a full-time salaried job where we were dubiously classified as managerial/technical experts and worked a lot of unpaid overtime in the construction season, which lead to some resentment. I dealt with it by self-authorizing "working from home" on Thursday and Friday afternoons in the off-season and taking hour-long paid lunches like 4 days a week. My supervisor worked out of his house and it was always plausible that I was off doing fieldwork when I left the office at 1:45 in the afternoon, so I think no one really noticed for the whole 2 years I worked there. Not a great system, but if companies are going to employ a don't-ask-don't-tell interpretation of the labor laws regulating who gets paid overtime, employees should try out DADT on the policies for break times/paid lunch/working from home. Eventually they gave me a raise and promoted me, continuing the long tradition of white mean leaning back and winning in the corporate world.
The gap between the cost of land+materials and the cost of housing in SF is the result of demand, not regulation. It is definitely more expensive to build in SF, but the main reason a one-bedroom costs $3500/month is not that the housing inspector required really fancy wiring or the construction permits were pricey, it's that there are a bunch of people around willing and able to pay $3500/month for a one-bedroom apartment. CAPITALISM!
@Josh Michtom@facebook I still totally thought it sounded like a robot
@Josh Michtom@facebook Yup, there is an income level where morality demands charity. I'm just not sure what it is, or what charity means in the context of a universal morality. Tithing as practiced by, say, modern Mormons responds to this same kind of ethical conundrum between wealth and righteousness, but the morality of sincere religious belief is too tied in to specific old texts to apply universally. I do think it's interesting that so many religions and belief systems have struggled with this problem - Islam traditionally forbids interest on loans and demands that a portion of income (variously interpreted) is given to help the poor, buddhism is more or less based on a renunciation of material wealth and goods, modern liberal humanism involves a lot of online discussions a la this one right here. Really not sure where I'm going with this, but yes: unless you limit your moral universe to some subset of humanity (family, religion, country, etc) that does not include any poor people, there is a moral obligation to donate to charity. Defining the boundaries of the group, and what exactly constitutes charity though... difficult.
Well, that was lovely. Morality and value get mixed up when you remember that we're all individual people though. Curing a sick kid in rural India is worth X; curing your own sick kid is worth infinity plus all of your money. Is it immoral to be self-interested in this kind of basic hereditary sense (ie to value your own progeny more highly than anyone else)? Honestly I'm not sure, but I want to say no. For the broader point about donating the money you don't "need": sure, but where, collected by whom, at what level, implemented how? You can have progressive taxation and argue about relative rates and geographic cutoffs (to which: if you live in Hawaii you shouldn't get a higher cutoff than people living in Mississippi. Hawaii is better than Mississippi and you pay more to live there. If I lease a BMW for hella $$$ I'm not poorer than I would be if I leased a Hyundai for only $.) or we could live in a Marxist society, but so far no one has figured out how to build one of those that works.
GF and I saved 10k each on salaries ~35k. It was the first year out of college, we didn't have a ton of loans to pay off, etc. Mostly we just lived on the wrong side of MLK, so the rent was cheap. Just the gap between our Oakland rent and any place we could get in SF accounted for about 5k of savings for each of us. We ended up traveling around California and then South America for 6 months. Hella worth it.