Linda Tirado & Why It Costs Money To Save Money

If the name Tirado rings a bell, it's perhaps because you remember the shitstorm that followed Tirado's first blog post for Gawker about being poor in America.

Taking a Pay Cut

Yesterday, Mark "Copyranter" Duffy put up a post on Gawker describing how he was fired from his job from Buzzfeed, which appeared to be mostly due to the fact that his job was to create posts being critical about advertisements, and, unsurprisingly, advertisers for the site were not happy about that.

Addressing Homelessness in a Way that Works

Gawker's Hamilton Nolan has a very good profile of George McDonald and the DOE Fund, a New York nonprofit that has proven itself to be particularly effective when it comes to putting an end to homelessness.

“When Leon dies, Bard will perhaps die as well”

In this Gawker polemic against Bard college, an expensive liberal arts school author Leah Finnegan attended for two years before transferring to a public university in the South, Finnegan argues that the fates of eccentric, longstanding college president Leon Botstein and the college itself are linked: “When Leon dies, Bard will perhaps die as well.” In other words, she suggests that Bard, like so many non-profits, suffers from Founder’s Syndrome.

Founder’s Syndrome occurs when a single individual or a small group of individuals bring an organization through tough times (a start-up, a growth spurt, a financial collapse, etc.). Often these sorts of situations require a strong passionate personality – someone who can make fast decisions and motivate people to action.Once those rough times are over, however, the decision-making needs of the organization change, requiring mechanisms for shared responsibility and authority. It is when those decision-making mechanisms don’t change, regardless of growth and changes on the program side, that Founder’s Syndrome becomes an issue. We see this most frequently with organizations that have grown from a mom-and-pop operation to a $12 million community powerhouse, while decisions are still made as if the founders are gathered around someone’s living room, desperately trying to hold things together.

Founder’s Syndrome isn’t necessarily about the actual founder of an organization. The central figure could be the person who took over from the founder. It could be someone who took over in a time of crisis, and led the organization to clear waters. Or it could just be someone who has been at the helm forever. The “founder” could be the CEO. Or it could be a board member, or a handful of board members who have either been there since the beginning or have ridden the organization through tough times.

But the main symptom of Founder’s Syndrome is that decisions are not made collectively. Most decisions are simply made by the “founder.” All other parties merely rubber stamp what the founder suggests. There is generally strong resistance to any change in that decision-making, where the Founder might lose his/her total control of the organization. Boards of these organizations usually don’t govern, but instead “approve” what the founder suggests. Planning isn’t done collectively, but by the founder. And plans / ideas that do NOT come from the founder usually don’t go very far.

Partly because Leon “hates money,” Finnegan argues, Leon’s school, despite tuition hikes, is hanging on by a thread. 

Keep It Short and Sweet When Quitting

Basically, as good as it might make you feel, it's not time to vent about all the reasons you hate your job and the people you worked with as we learned from this "I Quit" email posted on Gawker last night.

State : Europe :: Companies : U.S.

Forbes has a thing about how great it is to work at Gawker now (subsidized gym memberships! ordered-in meals! great healthcare!). Basically the company is offering startup tech-company level benefits now. This quote from head Nick Denton really struck me: “I have to come to terms with the paternalism of American business. Companies are expected to take on so many social responsibilities which are the province of the state in Europe.” !! RIGHT. It’s so true. Would that we all could work for companies that took on the responsibility (or, that we lived in a country that took it upon itself to make sure they did).

Would You Rather Lobby for Russia or Be Sexually Harassed for American Apparel?

Two esteemed US senators emeriti have begun to lobby for Putin’s Russia, which is like signing on to defend the Galactic Empire. But things aren’t so super-great here on our shores either: try to read this account of 20 icky days spent as an employee of American Apparel without wrinkling your nose. There are jobs you hate, and then there are jobs that make you hate yourself. Like giving yourself over Dov Charney’s slimy and racist sexploitation shops or selling out on behalf of a frozen yet oil-rich homophobic plutocracy.

Jane Doe reports:

In retrospect, I should’ve been more wary of a company with a history of outrageous unprofessionalism. What I hoped would be a low-stress, part-time job turned out to be a major source of anxiety and a cesspool of harassment. The incompetent, appallingly racist management and belittling of employees were commonplace, and created a hostile work environment.

It’s unfortunate that American Apparel requires employees to sign agreements saying they won’t speak ill of the company upon leaving. I’m sure that there are many upset employees (including some that I worked with) that are afraid to speak out.

This is why it’s hard to learn from other people’s experiences: it’s so easy to hope we’ll do things, or be treated, differently. Anyway it’s not like there are jobs dangling from the trees like ripe fruit ready to be picked. Sometimes you have to take what you can get and hope for you have developed an immuno-resistance to hostile work environments. Also, things change, often in very strange ways. Work for Playboy! They’re waving a feminist flag high and proud these days.

Explaining the Sequester

Multiple attempts to explain the sequester.

Published Papers Reveal Some Things About Some Dude, Possibly

Gawker has published 950 pages of confidential documents from funds Mitt Romney has money in (many of them holdings of Bain Capital).

Is this important? Opinions vary.