The Ultimatum Game

The test that Henrich introduced to the Machiguenga was called the ultimatum game. The rules are simple: in each game there are two players who remain anonymous to each other. The first player is given an amount of money, say $100, and told that he has to offer some of the cash, in an amount of his choosing, to the other subject. The second player can accept or refuse the split. But there’s a hitch: players know that if the recipient refuses the offer, both leave empty-handed. North Americans, who are the most common subjects for such experiments, usually offer a 50-50 split when on the giving end. When on the receiving end, they show an eagerness to punish the other player for uneven splits at their own expense. In short, Americans show the tendency to be equitable with strangers—and to punish those who are not.Among the Machiguenga, word quickly spread of the young, square-jawed visitor from America giving away money. The stakes Henrich used in the game with the Machiguenga were not insubstantial—roughly equivalent to the few days’ wages they sometimes earned from episodic work with logging or oil companies. So Henrich had no problem finding volunteers. What he had great difficulty with, however, was explaining the rules, as the game struck the Machiguenga as deeply odd.
When he began to run the game it became immediately clear that Machiguengan behavior was dramatically different from that of the average North American. To begin with, the offers from the first player were much lower. In addition, when on the receiving end of the game, the Machiguenga rarely refused even the lowest possible amount. “It just seemed ridiculous to the Machiguenga that you would reject an offer of free money,” says Henrich. “They just didn’t understand why anyone would sacrifice money to punish someone who had the good luck of getting to play the other role in the game.”
This interesting story comes from Pacific Standard, which makes us rethink some of the economics and social science research out there explaining how humans behave. Basically, Americans are just totally weird.











Having not clicked through to read about the study at all, I’m going to speculate that perhaps the difference in behavior was caused by the amount of money involved. For most Americans, $100 is significantly less than the few days’ wages at stake in the Machiguengan game. I would imagine that the larger the amount at stake, the more tempting it is to take the money regardless of how selfish the other person is being. If somebody is offering me $1 million, I’m going to take it even if they are selfishly keeping the other $99 million for themselves.
@jason The point isn’t just the ultimatum game, but a whole range of behavioral psych/economics research where American grad students (the default research population) differ dramatically from people in other societies.
@jason
Oooh, that’s an interesting idea, I’d love to see it tested!
@r&rkd I’d join that study.
@stuffisthings
Okay, you find funding for a study with sizable cash rewards for me to participate in, and I’ll find funding for a study with sizable cash rewards for you to participate in. Win/win?
Then, we can also get funding for a study applying the prisoner’s dilemma to whether we’ll actually go through with this!
@r&rkd Wait are you American? I think I’d much rather partner with a Machiguenga researcher.