<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Complain to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (And Get A Check)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thebillfold.com/2013/02/how-to-complain-to-the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-and-get-a-check/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thebillfold.com/2013/02/how-to-complain-to-the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-and-get-a-check/</link>
	<description>Everything About Money You Were Too Polite To Ask</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 May 2013 03:29:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Kzinti</title>
		<link>http://thebillfold.com/2013/02/how-to-complain-to-the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-and-get-a-check/#comment-34642</link>
		<dc:creator>Kzinti</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 Feb 2013 04:49:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebillfold.com/?p=23097#comment-34642</guid>
		<description>It sounds as if the bank charged a legitimate overdraft fee, since it had to pay for something for which the author did not have enough money to cover, so I&#039;m not sure why it should have been reversed in the first place.

The author mentions, &quot;New legislation had passed that seemed to prohibit overdraft fees,&quot; but I&#039;ve never heard of any legislation that would prohibit overdraft fees, and there is no link to that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It sounds as if the bank charged a legitimate overdraft fee, since it had to pay for something for which the author did not have enough money to cover, so I&#8217;m not sure why it should have been reversed in the first place.</p>
<p>The author mentions, &#8220;New legislation had passed that seemed to prohibit overdraft fees,&#8221; but I&#8217;ve never heard of any legislation that would prohibit overdraft fees, and there is no link to that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cmg16</title>
		<link>http://thebillfold.com/2013/02/how-to-complain-to-the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-and-get-a-check/#comment-34610</link>
		<dc:creator>cmg16</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2013 21:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebillfold.com/?p=23097#comment-34610</guid>
		<description>But this isn&#039;t just about bad customer service - it&#039;s about the bank actually breaking the law in order to get more money, so to my mind it&#039;s totally justified for the government to intervene.  Just a quick google search points out that banks got $30 billion in profits from overdraft fees in 2012.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But this isn&#8217;t just about bad customer service &#8211; it&#8217;s about the bank actually breaking the law in order to get more money, so to my mind it&#8217;s totally justified for the government to intervene.  Just a quick google search points out that banks got $30 billion in profits from overdraft fees in 2012.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: readyornot</title>
		<link>http://thebillfold.com/2013/02/how-to-complain-to-the-consumer-financial-protection-bureau-and-get-a-check/#comment-34335</link>
		<dc:creator>readyornot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Feb 2013 19:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://thebillfold.com/?p=23097#comment-34335</guid>
		<description>Real message of the article: &quot;It’s easy to complain, and complaining seems to have gotten results. But the idea that the government has to mediate customer service disputes is a pretty sad commentary on the state of the banking industry.&quot;

Sad indeed.  But banking customer service really does seem to require persistence or external intervention of some sort.  I kept getting run around with inconsistent answer once in a dispute, and I think I contacted the bank three or four times in order to get a fee reversed.  Same incident, different bank implicated: only required one time.  So I guess it does vary by bank.  </description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Real message of the article: &#8220;It’s easy to complain, and complaining seems to have gotten results. But the idea that the government has to mediate customer service disputes is a pretty sad commentary on the state of the banking industry.&#8221;</p>
<p>Sad indeed.  But banking customer service really does seem to require persistence or external intervention of some sort.  I kept getting run around with inconsistent answer once in a dispute, and I think I contacted the bank three or four times in order to get a fee reversed.  Same incident, different bank implicated: only required one time.  So I guess it does vary by bank.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
